Violation of FTC Part 255 Endorsement Guidelines Leads to $250,000 Payment

When the guidelines relating to the use of endorsements and testimonials took effect in late 2009, many online marketers and advertisers were left to wonder what the practical effects would be.  Would the guidelines be enforced by the FTC?  Would a slap on the wrist be the worst case scenario for online marketers not in the brick-and-mortar arena?  Could online marketers claim ignorance or ask for forgiveness to avoid monetary penalties?

A recent Federal Trade Commission (FTC) announcement revealed that an online marketer has agreed to pay $250,000 for its deceptive representation that the endorsements, which were made by affiliates, were "independent" reviews of ordinary customers.  The FTC's investigation found that the endorsements were in fact made by affiliates earning commissions with each click and subsequent purchase of the online marketers' goods.

Online marketers should take notice of this and ensure that the FTC Part 255 guidelines are followed, proper monitoring is performed, and clear and conspicuous disclosures are made where necessary.  Traverse Legal's internet law attorneys can provide the advice necessary.

📚 Get AI-powered insights from this content:

Author


Enrico Schaefer

As a founding partner of Traverse Legal, PLC, he has more than thirty years of experience as an attorney for both established companies and emerging start-ups. His extensive experience includes navigating technology law matters and complex litigation throughout the United States.

Years of experience: 35+ years
LinkedIn /Justia / YouTube

GET IN Touch

We’re here to field your questions and concerns. If you are a company able to pay a reasonable legal fee each month, please contact us today.

CATEGORIES

#

This page has been written, edited, and reviewed by a team of legal writers following our comprehensive editorial guidelines. This page was approved by attorney Enrico Schaefer, who has more than 20 years of legal experience as a practicing Business, IP, and Technology Law litigation attorney.