Google Dismissed from AdWords Trademark Case

Google scored a trademark victory over GEICO in a battle over key word advertising. Google offers advertisers the ability to have their ads feature in Google, and on other web sites based on key words people search for everyday. Google was sued when it allowed advertisers to set up their key word campaigns to trigger based on searches for their competitor’s names.

The court found that this practice did not violate trademark rights of the insurance carrier. Read the whole story. This is an important victory for internret advertisers who might otherwise get sucked into litigaiton brought by trademark owners againt competitors.

"There is no evidence that that activity alone causes confusion, " Brinkema said, in granting Google’s motion for summary judgment on that issue.

But Brinkema said the case would continue to move forward on one remaining issue, whether ads that pop up and actually use Geico in their text violate trademark law. Google contends that its policies expressly forbid advertisers from using trademark names in the text of their ads. The search engine says it does its best to prevent ads that violate the policy from sneaking in, and that the advertisers would liable for any trademark violation, not Google.

📚 Get AI-powered insights from this content:

Author


Enrico Schaefer

As a founding partner of Traverse Legal, PLC, he has more than thirty years of experience as an attorney for both established companies and emerging start-ups. His extensive experience includes navigating technology law matters and complex litigation throughout the United States.

Years of experience: 35+ years
LinkedIn /Justia / YouTube

GET IN Touch

We’re here to field your questions and concerns. If you are a company able to pay a reasonable legal fee each month, please contact us today.

CATEGORIES

#

This page has been written, edited, and reviewed by a team of legal writers following our comprehensive editorial guidelines. This page was approved by attorney Enrico Schaefer, who has more than 20 years of legal experience as a practicing Business, IP, and Technology Law litigation attorney.